Hutchinson v. Bien

104 A.D. 214, 93 N.Y.S. 216
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1905·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Miller, J. :

This is an appeal from an order granting the plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the answer as frivolous. The answer is as follows: “ I. On information and belief, he denies the allegations as alleged in paragraphs II, III and IV of the complaint herein.”

The vice of this answer is found in the words “as alleged,” which limit the denial to the form of the allegations of the complaint instead of denying the substance. Such a denial is clearly bad upon mere inspection, and the order appealed from should, therefore, be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Hirschberg, P. J., Bartlett, Jenks. and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutchinson v. Bien, 104 A.D. 214, 93 N.Y.S. 216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

104 A.D. 214 (Hutchinson v. Bien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trachtenberg v. Converse & Co.
109 Misc. 487 (New York Supreme Court, 1919)
Martin v. Smith
126 A.D. 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)