Hutchinson v. Alcliff Landscaping & Nursery, Inc.
This text of 187 A.D.2d 1043 (Hutchinson v. Alcliff Landscaping & Nursery, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant established by evidentiary proof in admissible form that it owed no duty to plaintiffs to salt Nabisco’s parking lot before plaintiff Phyllis Hutchinson fell there. Plaintiffs have failed to raise an issue of fact requiring a trial (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Rath, Jr., J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 A.D.2d 1043, 593 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchinson-v-alcliff-landscaping-nursery-inc-nyappdiv-1992.