Hutchins v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 2025·No. 1D2025-0197·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2025-0197

SHELDON LEE HUTCHINS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

October 1, 2025

PER CURIAM.

Because the lower tribunal has ruled on Petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State, 343 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022); Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).

RAY, KELSEY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Sheldon Lee Hutchins, pro se, Petitioner.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutchins v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Hutchins v. State of Florida (Hutchins v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.