Hutchins v. State
This text of 71 S.E. 162 (Hutchins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “Crooms” and “Grooms” are idem sonans, and the court did not err in instructing the jury that they are sueh as a matter of law. Woody v. State, 113 Ga. 927 (39 S. E. 297).
2. From the evidence for the State, none being introduced by the de- • fendant, it appears that the defendant struck the decedent on the head with an ax, inflicting a mortal wound; and it appears that there - was no provocation for the homicide, except certain insulting and opprobrious words used by the decedent to the defendant. Held, that the omission of a charge on the subject of voluntary manslaughter was not error. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 S.E. 162, 136 Ga. 246, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchins-v-state-ga-1911.