Hutchins v. State

71 S.E. 162, 136 Ga. 246, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 503
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 9, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 S.E. 162 (Hutchins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hutchins v. State, 71 S.E. 162, 136 Ga. 246, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 503 (Ga. 1911).

Opinion

Beck, J.

1. “Crooms” and “Grooms” are idem sonans, and the court did not err in instructing the jury that they are sueh as a matter of law. Woody v. State, 113 Ga. 927 (39 S. E. 297).

2. From the evidence for the State, none being introduced by the de- • fendant, it appears that the defendant struck the decedent on the head with an ax, inflicting a mortal wound; and it appears that there - was no provocation for the homicide, except certain insulting and opprobrious words used by the decedent to the defendant. Held, that the omission of a charge on the subject of voluntary manslaughter was not error. Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices eoneur. Indictment for murder. Before Judge J. B. Park. Baldwin superior court. March 20, 1911. Hines & Vinson, for plaintiff in error. H. A. Hall, attorney-general, and J. H. Pottle, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Champion v. Martin
183 S.E.2d 571 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 S.E. 162, 136 Ga. 246, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchins-v-state-ga-1911.