Hutchins v. State

71 S.E. 162, 136 Ga. 246, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 503
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 9, 1911·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

1. “Crooms” and “Grooms” are idem sonans, and the court did not err in instructing the jury that they are sueh as a matter of law. Woody v. State, 113 Ga. 927 (39 S. E. 297).

2. From the evidence for the State, none being introduced by the de- • fendant, it appears that the defendant struck the decedent on the head with an ax, inflicting a mortal wound; and it appears that there - was no provocation for the homicide, except certain insulting and opprobrious words used by the decedent to the defendant. Held, that the omission of a charge on the subject of voluntary manslaughter was not error. Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices eoneur. Indictment for murder. Before Judge J. B. Park. Baldwin superior court. March 20, 1911. Hines & Vinson, for plaintiff in error. H. A. Hall, attorney-general, and J. H. Pottle, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutchins v. State, 71 S.E. 162, 136 Ga. 246, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 503 (Ga. 1911).

71 S.E. 162 (Hutchins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Champion v. Martin
183 S.E.2d 571 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)