Hutchins v. State

345 So. 2d 711, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3889
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 31, 1977
DocketNo. 47820
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 345 So. 2d 711 (Hutchins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hutchins v. State, 345 So. 2d 711, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3889 (Fla. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ, Fla.App., 314 So.2d 646. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG and ROBERTS (Retired), JJ., concur. BOYD and HATCHETT, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vinson v. State
345 So. 2d 711 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 So. 2d 711, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchins-v-state-fla-1977.