Hutchins v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hutchins v. State

114 So. 922, 22 Ala. App. 675

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 1927

Docket6 Div. 217.

StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 922 (Hutchins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hutchins v. State, 114 So. 922, 22 Ala. App. 675 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

At the March, 1927, term of the circuit court of Tuscaloosa county the grand jury returned an indictment against this appellant, charging him with a violation of section 5411 of the Code of 1923; the offense being that of having carnal knowledge of a girl over 12 and under 16 years of age. He was tried upon said indictment, and convicted, as charged therein; the jury fixed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for 5 years. The trial was had, and judgment pronounced and entered on March 23, 1927, from which this appeal was taken. The cause is here submitted upon the record only; there is no bill of exceptions. An examination of the record discloses its regularity in all things. No error being apparent, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

At the March, 1927, term of the circuit court of Tuscaloosa county the grand jury returned an indictment against this appellant, charging him with a violation of section 5411 of the Code of 1923; the offense being that of having carnal knowledge of a girl over 12 and under 16 years of age. He was tried upon said indictment, and convicted, as charged therein; the jury fixed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for 5 years. The trial was had, and judgment pronounced and entered on March 23, 1927, from which this appeal was taken. The cause is here submitted upon the record only; there is no bill of exceptions. An examination of the record discloses its regularity in all things. No error being apparent, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 So. 922, 22 Ala. App. 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchins-v-state-alactapp-1927.