Hutchins v. Eden & Court

3 Md. 101
General Court of Virginia·Decided May 15, 1792·Published

Opinion

PER totam curiam.

A witness summoned on the part of the plaintiff, but not sworn. His attendance was allowed to be taxed in the bill of costs, on the plaintiff’s making affidavit that at the time of summoning him he thought he was a material witness to prove the facts set forth in the affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutchins v. Eden & Court, 3 Md. 101 (Va. Super. Ct. 1792).

3 Md. 101 (Hutchins v. Eden & Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.