Hutchins v. Eden & Court

3 Md. 101
CourtGeneral Court of Virginia
DecidedMay 15, 1792
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Md. 101 (Hutchins v. Eden & Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hutchins v. Eden & Court, 3 Md. 101 (Va. Super. Ct. 1792).

Opinion

PER totam curiam.

A witness summoned on the part of the plaintiff, but not sworn. His attendance was allowed to be taxed in the bill of costs, on the plaintiff’s making affidavit that at the time of summoning him he thought he was a material witness to prove the facts set forth in the affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Md. 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchins-v-eden-court-vagensess-1792.