Hutchins v. Beeler

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 29, 2009
Docket09-6202
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hutchins v. Beeler (Hutchins v. Beeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hutchins v. Beeler, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6202

JAMES H. HUTCHINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

A.F. BEELER, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:08-hc-02042-D)

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 29, 2009

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James H. Hutchins, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James H. Hutchins appeals a district court order

denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition and denying his

second motion to amend his petition. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons

cited by the district court. See Hutchins v. Beeler, No. 5:08-

hc-02042-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hutchins v. Beeler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchins-v-beeler-ca4-2009.