Hutchins v. Beeler
This text of Hutchins v. Beeler (Hutchins v. Beeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6202
JAMES H. HUTCHINS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
A.F. BEELER, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:08-hc-02042-D)
Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 29, 2009
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James H. Hutchins, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James H. Hutchins appeals a district court order
denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition and denying his
second motion to amend his petition. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons
cited by the district court. See Hutchins v. Beeler, No. 5:08-
hc-02042-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hutchins v. Beeler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchins-v-beeler-ca4-2009.