Hutchings v. Roquemore

139 S.E. 216, 164 Ga. 637, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 239
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 20, 1927
DocketNo. 5267
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 139 S.E. 216 (Hutchings v. Roquemore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hutchings v. Roquemore, 139 S.E. 216, 164 Ga. 637, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 239 (Ga. 1927).

Opinions

Russell, C. J.

The Supreme Court will not undertake to review the constitutionality of an aet of the General Assembly, raised for the first time in the bill of exceptions. In the instant ease the judgment of the municipal court of Macon was sought to be reviewed by petition for certiorari presented to the judge of the superior court, which the latter declined to sanction. In the petition for certiorari the constitutionality of the act of 1925 (Acts 1925, p. 463) regulating the practice as to ap[638]*638peals in that court was not questioned or attacked. Consequently the unconstitutionality of said act now sought to be assailed in this court was not before the judge of the superior court for consideration or adjudication. Judgment affirmed.

[637]*637Appeal and Error, 3 C. J. p. 710, n. 73.

Certiorari, 11 C. J. p. 149, n. 12; p. 218, n. 81; p. 219, n. 84.

Courts, 15 C. J. p. 1039, n. 52.

Evidence, 22 C. J. p. 148, n. 67.

[638]*638No. 5267. June 20, 1927. On rehearing, September 13, 1927. E. F. Qoodrum, for plaintiff in error. J. D. Hughes and H. W. McCoy, contra. All the Justices concur. ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ford v. State
344 S.E.2d 514 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Wreyford v. Peoples Loan & Finance Corp.
141 S.E.2d 216 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Payne v. State
183 S.E. 638 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
McGinty v. Gormley
183 S.E. 804 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Aspironal Laboratories Inc. v. Mallinckrodt Chemical Works
179 S.E. 709 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Anderson v. West Lumber Co.
179 S.E. 738 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Herndon v. State
176 S.E. 620 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Yarbrough v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.
168 S.E. 873 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Michael
158 S.E. 426 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Macon v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
154 S.E. 702 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Hutchings v. Roquemore
150 S.E. 571 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Fuller v. Yetter
148 S.E. 751 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Empire Investment Co. v. Hutchings
144 S.E. 209 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 S.E. 216, 164 Ga. 637, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchings-v-roquemore-ga-1927.