Hutchings v. Clark
30 P. 805, 64 Cal. 228, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 607
Opinion
power of attorney did not authorize satisfaction of the mortgage to be entered until the note was paid, and this event never occurred. We find no error in the record, and the judgment and order are affirmed.
Hearing in Bank denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hutchings v. Clark, 30 P. 805, 64 Cal. 228, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 607 (Cal. 1883).
30 P. 805 (Hutchings v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Porter v. Stuart
227 F. 840 (Fifth Circuit, 1915)
Kenney v. Jefferson County Bank
12 Colo. App. 24 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1898)