Hutchings v. Clark
30 P. 805, 64 Cal. 228, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 607
This text of 30 P. 805 (Hutchings v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hutchings v. Clark, 30 P. 805, 64 Cal. 228, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 607 (Cal. 1883).
Opinion
power of attorney did not authorize satisfaction of the mortgage to be entered until the note was paid, and this event never occurred. We find no error in the record, and the judgment and order are affirmed.
Hearing in Bank denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Porter v. Stuart
227 F. 840 (Fifth Circuit, 1915)
Kenney v. Jefferson County Bank
12 Colo. App. 24 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 P. 805, 64 Cal. 228, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutchings-v-clark-cal-1883.