Hutchings v. Childress

860 N.E.2d 764, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1439
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hutchings v. Childress. Read the opinion of the Court — 119 Ohio St. 3d 486
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 24, 2007·No. 2006-2183·Published

Opinion

Delaware App. No. 05CAE05-031, 2006-Ohio-3925. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed November 17, 2006:

‘Whether spouses can recover the income lost due to one spouse caring for another or whether they may only recover the cost to hire outside home health care.”

Moyer, C.J., O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

The conflict ease is Depouw v. Bichette, 162 Ohio App.3d 336, 2005-Ohio-3695.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-1703, Hutchings v. Childress, Delaware App. No. 05CAE05-031, 2006-Ohio-3925.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutchings v. Childress, 860 N.E.2d 764, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1439 (Ohio 2007).

860 N.E.2d 764 (Hutchings v. Childress) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Depouw v. Bichette
833 N.E.2d 744 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
Hutchings v. Childress, Unpublished Decision (7-27-2006)
2006 Ohio 3925 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)