Hutcheson v. Mioducki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hutcheson v. Mioducki

67 N.Y.S. 1135

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 67 N.Y.S. 1135 (Hutcheson v. Mioducki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hutcheson v. Mioducki, 67 N.Y.S. 1135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from is modified by striking out the ordering part thereof, and substituting in lieu thereof the following, viz.: “Ordered, that the plaintiff have judgment against said Robert Y. Milne for the sum of $220, and interest thereon from the 5th day of June, 1900, being the amount of deficiency on such sale, and the $10 costs of motion,”—and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from is modified by striking out the ordering part thereof, and substituting in lieu thereof the following, viz.: “Ordered, that the plaintiff have judgment against said Robert Y. Milne for the sum of $220, and interest thereon from the 5th day of June, 1900, being the amount of deficiency on such sale, and the $10 costs of motion,”—and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 N.Y.S. 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hutcheson-v-mioducki-nyappdiv-1900.