Hut v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hut v. State

519 So. 2d 1, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1380, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8570, 1987 WL 615

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 19, 1987

DocketNos. 86-398, 87-1217

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 519 So. 2d 1 (Hut v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hut v. State, 519 So. 2d 1, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1380, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8570, 1987 WL 615 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court having considered the allegations raised by the defendant in his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, in connection with the appeal from his judgment of conviction and sentence, we find that the allegations of the petitioner/defendant have merit. We grant the petition and reverse the sentence. The trial court is directed to reduce the defendant’s sentence of imprisonment to two and one-half years in accordance with the plea agreement and to order the defendant’s immediate discharge from custody inasmuch as he has already served his proper sentence. Johnson v. State, 501 So.2d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). No motion for rehearing will be entertained and the mandate of this court will be issued with the filing of this opinion.

Writ granted, sentence reversed, and defendant discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The court having considered the allegations raised by the defendant in his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, in connection with the appeal from his judgment of conviction and sentence, we find that the allegations of the petitioner/defendant have merit. We grant the petition and reverse the sentence. The trial court is directed to reduce the defendant’s sentence of imprisonment to two and one-half years in accordance with the plea agreement and to order the defendant’s immediate discharge from custody inasmuch as he has already served his proper sentence. Johnson v. State, 501 So.2d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). No motion for rehearing will be entertained and the mandate of this court will be issued with the filing of this opinion.

Writ granted, sentence reversed, and defendant discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

519 So. 2d 1, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1380, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8570, 1987 WL 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hut-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack