Hut v. Fraser

12 A.D.2d 641, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6502
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Mabel Fraser, an incompetent person, by her committee, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 8, 1960, which denies her motion for an order vacating the. summons and complaint, vacating the default judgment entered in the action, and nullifying subsequent conveyances and liens on the premises. The defendant was adjudicated an incompetent and a committee for her person and property was appointed after the entry of judgment in the foreclosure action and after the sale of the property to a bona fide purchaser for a valuable and fair consideration. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements (see, e.g., Goldberg v. McCord, 251 N. Y. 28). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hut v. Fraser, 12 A.D.2d 641, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

12 A.D.2d 641 (Hut v. Fraser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Citibank, N.A. v. Grant
21 A.D.3d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)