Huszar v. Sarubbi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Huszar v. Sarubbi

251 A.D.2d 406, 672 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6612

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D.2d 406 (Huszar v. Sarubbi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huszar v. Sarubbi, 251 A.D.2d 406, 672 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6612 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding to vacate an arbitration award made pursuant to 22 NYCRR 136.1 et seq. entered on the respondent’s default in appearing at the arbitration, Janis W. Sarubbi appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.), dated December 11, 1997, which granted the respondent’s motion to vacate the award and resubmitted the matter to new arbitrators.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[407]*407The Supreme Court properly vacated the arbitration award and resubmitted the matter to new arbitrators (see, CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iv]; Apollo Reproductions v West 35th St. Assocs., 186 AD2d 52; see also, CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [i]; Matter of Bevona [Superior Maintenance Co.], 204 AD2d 136). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding to vacate an arbitration award made pursuant to 22 NYCRR 136.1 et seq. entered on the respondent’s default in appearing at the arbitration, Janis W. Sarubbi appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ingrassia, J.), dated December 11, 1997, which granted the respondent’s motion to vacate the award and resubmitted the matter to new arbitrators.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[407]*407The Supreme Court properly vacated the arbitration award and resubmitted the matter to new arbitrators (see, CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iv]; Apollo Reproductions v West 35th St. Assocs., 186 AD2d 52; see also, CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [i]; Matter of Bevona [Superior Maintenance Co.], 204 AD2d 136). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 406, 672 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huszar-v-sarubbi-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack