Huston v. State
This text of 720 S.W.2d 27 (Huston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Movant appeals from an order granting the state’s motion to dismiss his third Rule 27.26 motion. The court heard evidence on the state’s motion to dismiss, but did not hold an evidentiary hearing on the 27.26 motion. Movant was granted evidentiary hearings on his two previous 27.26 motions, and the denial of the second motion was appealed. We affirmed in Huston v. State, 679 S.W.2d 408 (Mo.App.1984). We find no ground alleged which might entitle movant to relief which could not have been raised in the prior motions. 27.26(d).
Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
720 S.W.2d 27, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 4806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huston-v-state-moctapp-1986.