Huston v. Regn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Huston v. Regn

39 A. 208, 184 Pa. 419, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 912

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 17, 1898

DocketAppeal, No. 187

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 39 A. 208 (Huston v. Regn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huston v. Regn, 39 A. 208, 184 Pa. 419, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 912 (Pa. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

There is no substantial error, either in the findings of fact or in the legal conclusions on which the modified decree in this case is predicated; nor is there anything in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion.

For reasons given by the learned judge who presided at the hearing in the common pleas the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at defendant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

There is no substantial error, either in the findings of fact or in the legal conclusions on which the modified decree in this case is predicated; nor is there anything in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion.

For reasons given by the learned judge who presided at the hearing in the common pleas the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at defendant’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A. 208, 184 Pa. 419, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huston-v-regn-pa-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack