Huston v. Regn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Huston v. Regn

39 A. 208, 184 Pa. 419, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 912

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 17, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 187·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

There is no substantial error, either in the findings of fact or in the legal conclusions on which the modified decree in this case is predicated; nor is there anything in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion.

For reasons given by the learned judge who presided at the hearing in the common pleas the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at defendant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

There is no substantial error, either in the findings of fact or in the legal conclusions on which the modified decree in this case is predicated; nor is there anything in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion.

For reasons given by the learned judge who presided at the hearing in the common pleas the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at defendant’s costs.

Huston v. Regn, 39 A. 208, 184 Pa. 419, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 912 (Pa. 1898).

Pincite

39 A. 208 (Huston v. Regn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related