Huston v. Huston

63 Me. 184
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1874·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Dickerson, J.

Where the allegations in a libel for divorce are sufficient to give the court jurisdiction of the case, and to grant a divorce under its discretionary powers, the libellee cannot avail himself of merely circumstantial omissions to defeat the libel by demurrer.

If, in such case, the libellee desires greater particularity of statement he should move the court at nisi prius to order the libellant to furnish it. Exceptions overruled.

Appleton, C. J., Walton, Barrows, Virgin and Peters, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huston v. Huston, 63 Me. 184 (Me. 1874).

63 Me. 184 (Huston v. Huston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lane v. Dunning
218 S.W. 269 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1920)
Williams v. Williams
23 N.W. 110 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1885)