HUSTON, JUDGE v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Haskell

215 U.S. 592, 30 S. Ct. 407, 54 L. Ed. 340, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1864
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 3, 1910
Docket325
StatusPublished

This text of 215 U.S. 592 (HUSTON, JUDGE v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Haskell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
HUSTON, JUDGE v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Haskell, 215 U.S. 592, 30 S. Ct. 407, 54 L. Ed. 340, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1864 (1910).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Ha ire v. Rice, 204 U. S. 291; Corkran Oil Co. v. Arnaudet, 199 U. S. 146; Luther v. Borden, 7 How. 1; Taylor v. Beckham, 178 U. S. 548; case below, 21 Oklahoma, 782.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Luther v. Borden
48 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1849)
Taylor and Marshall v. Beckham
178 U.S. 548 (Supreme Court, 1900)
McGuire v. Blount
199 U.S. 142 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Montant Ex Rel. Haire v. Rice
204 U.S. 291 (Supreme Court, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 U.S. 592, 30 S. Ct. 407, 54 L. Ed. 340, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huston-judge-v-state-of-oklahoma-ex-rel-haskell-scotus-1910.