HUSTON, JUDGE v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Haskell

215 U.S. 592, 30 S. Ct. 407, 54 L. Ed. 340, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1864
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 3, 1910·No. 325·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Ha ire v. Rice, 204 U. S. 291; Corkran Oil Co. v. Arnaudet, 199 U. S. 146; Luther v. Borden, 7 How. 1; Taylor v. Beckham, 178 U. S. 548; case below, 21 Oklahoma, 782.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HUSTON, JUDGE v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Haskell, 215 U.S. 592, 30 S. Ct. 407, 54 L. Ed. 340, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1864 (1910).

215 U.S. 592 (HUSTON, JUDGE v. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Haskell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Luther v. Borden
48 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1849)
Taylor and Marshall v. Beckham
178 U.S. 548 (Supreme Court, 1900)
McGuire v. Blount
199 U.S. 142 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Montant Ex Rel. Haire v. Rice
204 U.S. 291 (Supreme Court, 1907)