Huston ex rel. Perot v. Clark

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Huston ex rel. Perot v. Clark

34 A. 56, 173 Pa. 361, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 708

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 27, 1896

DocketAppeal, No. 483

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A. 56 (Huston ex rel. Perot v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huston ex rel. Perot v. Clark, 34 A. 56, 173 Pa. 361, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 708 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

It is unnecessary to cite authorities to show that the only question presented in this case was concluded by the final decree of this court in Clark’s Appeal, 162 Pa. 435. The question of costs, including of course the master’s fee now complained of, was directly involved in that case and must now be regarded as rem adjudicatam.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

It is unnecessary to cite authorities to show that the only question presented in this case was concluded by the final decree of this court in Clark’s Appeal, 162 Pa. 435. The question of costs, including of course the master’s fee now complained of, was directly involved in that case and must now be regarded as rem adjudicatam.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A. 56, 173 Pa. 361, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huston-ex-rel-perot-v-clark-pa-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack