Hustis v. Pickands

27 Ill. App. 270, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 514
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedSeptember 18, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 27 Ill. App. 270 (Hustis v. Pickands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hustis v. Pickands, 27 Ill. App. 270, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 514 (Ill. Ct. App. 1888).

Opinion

McAllister, J.

The ordinance set out in the special plea has been adjudged to be legal and valid. Braun v. Chicago, 110 Ill. 186. While the language of the ordinance is somewhat peculiar, yet we are inclined to the. opinion that it was intended to and does fairly embrace and apply to brokers in stocks. If we are right in that conclusion then it follows, as" we thinkfrom the doctrine of the prevailing current of authorities, that the plaintiffs, being unlicensed as brokers at the time of the purchase by them as such, of the stock in question, their act was unlawful and they can not recover commissions, so that the plea must be held to be good and the judgment affirmed.

Judgment affirmed*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Nat. Bank of Millstadt v. Freant
129 N.E.2d 276 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1955)
Rothwell v. Gibson
98 S.W. 801 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1906)
Randall v. Tuell
38 L.R.A. 143 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1897)
Whitfield v. Huling
50 Ill. App. 179 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1893)
Eckert v. Collot
46 Ill. App. 361 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1892)
Buckley v. Humason
16 L.R.A. 423 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1892)
Sternberg v. Strauss
41 Ill. App. 147 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1891)
Hamilton v. Harvey
33 Ill. App. 499 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Ill. App. 270, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hustis-v-pickands-illappct-1888.