Husted v. Cruikshank
17 N.Y.S. 943, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 935, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 591
This text of 17 N.Y.S. 943 (Husted v. Cruikshank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Husted v. Cruikshank, 17 N.Y.S. 943, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 935, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 591 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
Opinion
We are of the opinion that the plaintiff should be required to file security for costs, and that the order appealed from, relating to such security, should be reversed. We are also of the opinion that the order for the examination of the defendant should be reversed, with costs and disbursements to the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 N.Y.S. 943, 44 N.Y. St. Rep. 935, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/husted-v-cruikshank-nysupct-1892.