Husted v. Bank of Jefferson
1926 OK 248, 244 P. 795, 114 Okla. 150, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 964
Opinion
There being no substantial difference in the facts and law applicable in this cause ¡and cause No. 15728, H. J. Elling v. Bank of Jefferson, wherein an opinion is this day rendered, the syllabus and opinion therein rendered are adopted as the syllabus and opinion herein, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. (See 114 Okla. 147, 244 Pac. 793.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Husted v. Bank of Jefferson, 1926 OK 248, 244 P. 795, 114 Okla. 150, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 964 (Okla. 1926).
1926 OK 248 (Husted v. Bank of Jefferson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Elling v. Bank of Jefferson
1926 OK 238 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)