Hussmann Distributing Co. v. Cheneski
251 A.D. 847, 298 N.Y.S. 412, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7938
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 18, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order dismissing defendant’s affirmative defense and counterclaim reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion upon this record the defense and counterclaim struck out are sufficient as a matter of law and present a triable issue. (Van Schaick v. Edwards, 2 Johns. Cas. 355; London v. Toney, 263 N. Y. 439.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hussmann Distributing Co. v. Cheneski, 251 A.D. 847, 298 N.Y.S. 412, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7938 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
251 A.D. 847 (Hussmann Distributing Co. v. Cheneski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Schnirman
167 Misc. 809 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)