Hussmann Distributing Co. v. Cheneski
This text of 251 A.D. 847 (Hussmann Distributing Co. v. Cheneski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order dismissing defendant’s affirmative defense and counterclaim reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion upon this record the defense and counterclaim struck out are sufficient as a matter of law and present a triable issue. (Van Schaick v. Edwards, 2 Johns. Cas. 355; London v. Toney, 263 N. Y. 439.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D. 847, 298 N.Y.S. 412, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hussmann-distributing-co-v-cheneski-nyappdiv-1937.