Hussey v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Hussey v. State

20 S.W.3d 271, 340 Ark. 691, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 143

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided March 23, 2000·No. CR 00-269·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Vincent James Hussey, by his attorney, G. B. “Bing” Colvin, III, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 295 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Vincent James Hussey, by his attorney, G. B. “Bing” Colvin, III, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 295 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

Hussey v. State, 20 S.W.3d 271, 340 Ark. 691, 2000 Ark. LEXIS 143 (Ark. 2000).

Pincite

20 S.W.3d 271 (Hussey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related