Hussey v. New York Recorder Co.

35 N.Y.S. 49, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 441, 89 Hun 609
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 26, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 N.Y.S. 49 (Hussey v. New York Recorder Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hussey v. New York Recorder Co., 35 N.Y.S. 49, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 441, 89 Hun 609 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

PRATT, J.

I entertain no doubt of the propriety of the action of the learned trial judge in overruling this demurrer. The case of Moore v. Francis, 121 N. Y. 199, 23 N. E. 1127, so much relied on by appellant, is an authority against it. We think the complaint states a plain cause of action for libel. We fail to find in the opinion in that case the words apparently quoted in defendant’s points. Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to answer within 20 days, on payment of costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wemple v. Delano
187 Misc. 710 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 N.Y.S. 49, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 441, 89 Hun 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hussey-v-new-york-recorder-co-nysupct-1895.