Hussey v. Jewett

9 Mass. 100
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 15, 1812
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 9 Mass. 100 (Hussey v. Jewett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hussey v. Jewett, 9 Mass. 100 (Mass. 1812).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The promissory note of an infant is by one who [96]*96is under a legal disability to contract, with the single exception of a supply for necessaries; and, in that case, he is not concluded by a stipulation respecting prices; which seems to be the reason that a special promise and a bond in a penalty, even for necessaries, are alike void. And a void promise is not to be enforced against the. executor of a supposed party, any more than against the party himself. The evidence is annulled by the principle of law, that an infant is incapable of establishing such a contract against himself while under age. He may conclude himself by recognizing the consideration and promise after he comes of age; for this is a con tract and promise made then, the words of which are understood by the reference to the formal promise made in his infancy, and the renewal of it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Krise v. Lycoming Trust Co.
11 Pa. D. & C. 411 (Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas, 1928)
Dinsmore v. Webber
59 Me. 103 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1871)
Person v. Chase
37 Vt. 647 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1865)
Jefford's Adm'r v. Ringgold & Co.
6 Ala. 544 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1844)
M'Minn v. Richmonds
14 Tenn. 9 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1834)
Ford v. Phillips
18 Mass. 202 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1822)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Mass. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hussey-v-jewett-mass-1812.