Hussey v. Elrod
This text of 2 Ala. 339 (Hussey v. Elrod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The general rule of law is, that husband and wife cannot be witnesses, either for or against each other, either in civil or criminal proceedings. The rule is founded on the identity of their interest, 'and because it is necessary to guard the security and confidence of private life, which would be constantly invaded, if the married pair, in this respect, stood towards each other, as they do towards the rest of the world. It would seem to follow that, as the wife cannot give evidence so neither can she charge .her husband by an admission; for that would let in all the mischief which the rule is designed to prevent. It was so held in the case of Denn vs. White and wife, 7 Term. Rep. 112, and Hawkins vs. Halton and wife, 2 Nott & McCord 374. The admission of a wife, during coverture, of a debt due before marriage, is not admissible as evidence against the husband. [1 Halst. Rep. 366.]
There is no error in the judgment of the Court below, and it is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Ala. 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hussey-v-elrod-ala-1841.