Hussey v. Davis

58 N.H. 317
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 58 N.H. 317 (Hussey v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hussey v. Davis, 58 N.H. 317 (N.H. 1878).

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

No search-warrant can bo lawfully issued but in cases and with the formalities prescribed by law. Bill of Rights, art. 19. The common law of search-warrants, affirmed in the Bill of Rights, is of extraordinary strictness. Cooley Const. Lim. 303; Cooley on Torts 295. The “ warrant shall require the officer” “ to make return of his proceedings thereon, with an inventory of such things sought as shall there be found, and of such things as, being liable to seizure, have been taken by him, and are in custody.” Gen. St., c. 237, s. 8. In this case, as the warrant did not require the officer to make return of his proceedings or of an inventory, it is erroneous, and affords no justification to the defendant. Guenther v. Day, 6 Gray 490. He made return of his proceedings with the prescribed inventory: but the dei'ect in the warrant was not cured by his doing what a valid warrant would have required him to do.

Case discharged.

Foster, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Tucker
575 A.2d 810 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1990)
Jones v. State
306 So. 2d 45 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1975)
Miguel v. Alvarez
51 P.R. 386 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1937)
State v. Spirituous Liquors
73 A. 169 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 N.H. 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hussey-v-davis-nh-1878.