Hussain v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
This text of Hussain v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Hussain v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NASIR HUSSAIN,
Petitioner,
v. Civil Action No. 23-1808 (RDM) U.S. CITIZEN AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Now before the Court is the government’s motion to dismiss this mandamus petition,
which asks the Court to compel the government to adjudicate Petitioner’s Form I-526, as moot.
Dkt. 13; see, e.g., Dkt. 1 at 10 (Compl. ¶ 31) (“Defendants have a clear ministerial duty to
adjudicate Plaintiff’s filing, and there is no other remedy available.”); id. at 11–12. According to
the government, the case is moot because Petitioner’s Form I-526 was recently denied and thus
nothing remains to be adjudicated. Dkt. 13 at 1. The Court ordered Petitioner, who is
represented by counsel, to respond to the government’s motion on or before December 14, 2023.
Min. Order (Dec. 3, 2023); see LCvR 7 (“Within 14 days of service or at such other time as the
Court may direct, an opposing party shall serve and file a memorandum . . . in opposition to [a]
motion. If such a memorandum is not filed within the prescribed time, the Court may treat the
motion as conceded.”). Petitioner failed to do so.
The Court, accordingly, accepts the government’s representation of fact that Petitioner’s
Form I-526 petition has been adjudicated. Because Petitioner has received the relief his petition
sought, no live controversy remains for the Court to resolve. See U.S. Const. art. III, § 2. The Court, therefore, dismisses this case for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(1).
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. 13, is hereby
GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as
moot. A separate order will issue.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Randolph D. Moss RANDOLPH D. MOSS United States District Judge
Date: December 15, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hussain v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hussain-v-united-states-citizenship-and-immigration-services-dcd-2023.