Hussain v. Donovan

73 A.D.3d 573, 899 N.Y.S.2d 851
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 20, 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Determination of respondent New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD), dated June 27, 2008, terminating petitioner’s Section 8 housing subsidy, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Marylin G. Diamond, J.], entered June 26, 2009), dismissed, without costs.

HPD’s determination was supported by substantial evidence showing that petitioner violated HPD’s policy requiring truthful and complete reporting of family composition on the subject application and recertification forms (see Matter of Gerena v Donovan, 51 AD3d 502 [2008]). There exists no basis to disturb the hearing officer’s credibility determinations (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]).

The penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Gerena, 51 AD3d at 502).

[574] We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments, including that he was afforded ineffective assistance of counsel, and find them unavailing. Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hussain v. Donovan, 73 A.D.3d 573, 899 N.Y.S.2d 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

73 A.D.3d 573 (Hussain v. Donovan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morman v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & Development
81 A.D.3d 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)