Huss v. Sanabria

672 So. 2d 903, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728, 1996 WL 230745
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 1996·No. Nos. 94-3047, 95-2833·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a trial court order granting plaintiffs motion for a new trial on estate damages in a wrongful death action. The verdict returned by the jury in favor of the estate is not such as to “shock the conscience of the court.” See Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So.2d 430 (Fla.1978); Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Burdi, 427 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 431 So.2d 988 (Fla.1983). Accordingly, the verdict returned by the jury in favor of the estate must be reinstated.

In addition, pursuant to Wells v. Tallahassee Memorial Medical Center, Inc., 659 So.2d 249 (Fla.1995), the appellant is entitled to a set-off for the settlement amounts that the appellee has received from the other defendants. Accordingly, the case is remanded to the trial court for the entry of such orders as may be necessary and appropriate to comply therewith. In all other [904]*904respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Reversed in part, affirmed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Huss v. Sanabria, 672 So. 2d 903, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728, 1996 WL 230745 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

672 So. 2d 903 (Huss v. Sanabria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martinez v. Hertz Corp.
696 So. 2d 1212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)