Huss v. Sanabria

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Huss v. Sanabria

672 So. 2d 903, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728, 1996 WL 230745

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 8, 1996

DocketNos. 94-3047, 95-2833

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 672 So. 2d 903 (Huss v. Sanabria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Huss v. Sanabria, 672 So. 2d 903, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728, 1996 WL 230745 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a trial court order granting plaintiffs motion for a new trial on estate damages in a wrongful death action. The verdict returned by the jury in favor of the estate is not such as to “shock the conscience of the court.” See Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So.2d 430 (Fla.1978); Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Burdi, 427 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 431 So.2d 988 (Fla.1983). Accordingly, the verdict returned by the jury in favor of the estate must be reinstated.

In addition, pursuant to Wells v. Tallahassee Memorial Medical Center, Inc., 659 So.2d 249 (Fla.1995), the appellant is entitled to a set-off for the settlement amounts that the appellee has received from the other defendants. Accordingly, the case is remanded to the trial court for the entry of such orders as may be necessary and appropriate to comply therewith. In all other [904]*904respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Reversed in part, affirmed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a trial court order granting plaintiffs motion for a new trial on estate damages in a wrongful death action. The verdict returned by the jury in favor of the estate is not such as to “shock the conscience of the court.” See Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So.2d 430 (Fla.1978); Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Burdi, 427 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 431 So.2d 988 (Fla.1983). Accordingly, the verdict returned by the jury in favor of the estate must be reinstated.

In addition, pursuant to Wells v. Tallahassee Memorial Medical Center, Inc., 659 So.2d 249 (Fla.1995), the appellant is entitled to a set-off for the settlement amounts that the appellee has received from the other defendants. Accordingly, the case is remanded to the trial court for the entry of such orders as may be necessary and appropriate to comply therewith. In all other [904]*904respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Reversed in part, affirmed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

672 So. 2d 903, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728, 1996 WL 230745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huss-v-sanabria-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack