Huss v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport

155 A. 372, 9 N.J. Misc. 668, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 269
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 19, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 155 A. 372 (Huss v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huss v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport, 155 A. 372, 9 N.J. Misc. 668, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 269 (N.J. 1931).

Opinion

Pee Ctjbiam.

This is plaintiff’s rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted on the ground that the verdict is inadequate. The verdict was in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant in the sum of $600.

We think it cannot be said, in view of all of the testimony, that the verdict is inadequate. The jury might very well have declined to accept plaintiff’s testimony as to the extent of his loss of earnings. The injuries were not serious.

The rule to show cause will be discharged, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 A. 372, 9 N.J. Misc. 668, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huss-v-public-service-co-ordinated-transport-nj-1931.