Husketh v. Beck

55 F. App'x 158
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Husketh v. Beck. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 F. App'x 157
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 24, 2003·No. 02-7552·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Lee Husketh appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion to void that judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Husketh v. Beck, No. CA-02-465-5-H (E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 26, 2002, entered Aug. 27, 2002; Sept. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Husketh v. Beck, 55 F. App'x 158 (4th Cir. 2003).

55 F. App'x 158 (Husketh v. Beck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related