Huser v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP
This text of 174 F. App'x 754 (Huser v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Martha Huser appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination and denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Huser v. Antonelli, No. CA-04-1452 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 3, 2005 & entered Aug. 5, 2005; filed Aug. 8, 2005 & entered Aug. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 F. App'x 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huser-v-antonelli-terry-stout-kraus-llp-ca4-2006.