Huser v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP

Fourth Circuit

Huser v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP

174 F. App'x 754

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2006·No. No. 05-2027·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Martha Huser appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination and denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Huser v. Antonelli, No. CA-04-1452 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 3, 2005 & entered Aug. 5, 2005; filed Aug. 8, 2005 & entered Aug. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Martha Huser appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination and denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Huser v. Antonelli, No. CA-04-1452 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 3, 2005 & entered Aug. 5, 2005; filed Aug. 8, 2005 & entered Aug. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Huser v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP, 174 F. App'x 754 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

174 F. App'x 754 (Huser v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.