Huscher v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co.

173 A.D. 902, 157 N.Y.S. 1129

This text of 173 A.D. 902 (Huscher v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Huscher v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co., 173 A.D. 902, 157 N.Y.S. 1129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

—Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., dissented, upon the authority of Huscher v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Company (165 App. Div. 241).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huscher v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co.
165 A.D. 241 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 A.D. 902, 157 N.Y.S. 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/huscher-v-new-york-queens-electric-light-power-co-nyappdiv-1916.