Husband v. Kornbrath

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8133

EUNICE HUSBAND,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BRIAN JOSEPH KORNBRATH; FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief District Judge. (5:09-cv-00098-JRG-JES)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eunice Husband, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eunice Husband appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388 (1971) for failure to pay a partial filing fee. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Husband v. Kornbrath, No. 5:09-cv-00098-JRG-JES (N.D.W.

Va. Nov. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED