Husband L. v. Wife L.

336 A.2d 216, 1975 Del. LEXIS 608
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided April 8, 1975·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this action for specific performance of a separation agreement, the defendant, the former husband, appeals from a decision of the Court of Chancery upholding the validity of the agreement and directing the performance of his obligations thereunder. The decision from which this appeal is taken is reported at 287 A.2d 413 (1972).

*217 The Court of Chancery concluded that the challenged provisions of the agreement were not vague; that the agreement was fair in light of the circumstances existing at the time of its execution; and that the evidence was insufficient to establish that the separation agreement was a “bargain” for the procurement of a divorce.

We agree with those conclusions.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Husband L. v. Wife L., 336 A.2d 216, 1975 Del. LEXIS 608 (Del. 1975).

336 A.2d 216 (Husband L. v. Wife L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rockwell v. Rockwell
681 A.2d 1017 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1996)
Spencer v. Spencer
494 A.2d 1279 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1985)
Solis v. Tea
468 A.2d 1276 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1983)
Gertrude L.Q. v. Stephen P.Q.
466 A.2d 1213 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1983)
Murphy v. Murphy
467 A.2d 129 (Delaware Family Court, 1983)
Quisenberry v. Quisenberry
449 A.2d 274 (Delaware Family Court, 1982)
Harry M. P. v. Nina M. P.
437 A.2d 158 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1981)
C. v. A.
379 A.2d 1119 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1977)