Hurwitz v. Meyer

Third Circuit

Hurwitz v. Meyer

10 F.2d 1019, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2346

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 23, 1926

DocketNo. 3371

StatusPublished

This text of 10 F.2d 1019 (Hurwitz v. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurwitz v. Meyer, 10 F.2d 1019, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2346 (3d Cir. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On presentation of affidavits and after hearing the parties, the court below granted a preliminary injunction, the effect of which is to preserve the status in quo and prevent any further alleged injury to the plaintiff’s current business. After due consideration had, we find no ground for convicting the court of error in so doing, as it has, in its opinion, sufficiently vindicated its present action at this stage of the case.

The appeal is therefore dismissed, at the appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On presentation of affidavits and after hearing the parties, the court below granted a preliminary injunction, the effect of which is to preserve the status in quo and prevent any further alleged injury to the plaintiff’s current business. After due consideration had, we find no ground for convicting the court of error in so doing, as it has, in its opinion, sufficiently vindicated its present action at this stage of the case.

The appeal is therefore dismissed, at the appellant’s cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F.2d 1019, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurwitz-v-meyer-ca3-1926.