Hurwitz v. Hurwitz
This text of 3 A.D.2d 744 (Hurwitz v. Hurwitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed and the motion granted. Plaintiff has failed to establish special circumstances which would warrant a departure from the general rule denying examinations before trial in matrimonial actions. The mere fact that one of the causes of action alleged in the complaint is based on nonsupport is insufficient to establish special circumstances under subdivision 6 of rule XI of the New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules (Liebmann v. IAebmann, 3 A D 2d 660). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Botein, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 A.D.2d 744, 160 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurwitz-v-hurwitz-nyappdiv-1957.