Hurwitz v. Hurwitz

214 A.D. 823
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 214 A.D. 823 (Hurwitz v. Hurwitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hurwitz v. Hurwitz, 214 A.D. 823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Order granting plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed, without costs, with leave to defendant to plead, within ten days, the agreement in the English language, either in an amended answer or in an amended bill of particulars, upon payment of ten dollars costs to plaintiffs. The copy of the agreement alleged in the answer was set out in a foreign language. Our practice requires that all pleadings and like papers shall be in the English language. (Rules of Civil Practice, rule 10.) The copy of the contract set out in the record in the original Hebrew cannot be considered by this court, nor can the copy set out in the respondents’ brief be taken as the correct translation. The appeal, there[824]*824fore, cannot be intelligently disposed of on the record before us. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kelby and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosado v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.
103 A.D.2d 395 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Nuez v. Diaz
101 Misc. 2d 399 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)
Hurwitz v. Hurwitz
216 A.D. 362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 A.D. 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurwitz-v-hurwitz-nyappdiv-1925.