Hurvitz v. Hurvitz

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Hurvitz v. Hurvitz

1 R.I. Dec. 83

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJanuary 20, 1925

DocketDiv. No. 18200

StatusPublished

This text of 1 R.I. Dec. 83 (Hurvitz v. Hurvitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurvitz v. Hurvitz, 1 R.I. Dec. 83 (R.I. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

TANNER, P. J.

This is a petition for divorce upon the ground of nonsupport.

We ñnd from the evidence, first: that the petitioner has not proven by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the defendant has not provided necessaries for the support of herself and child for the statutory period to the best of his ability. On the contrary, it seems to us .that, considering his circumstances, he has done all that he could he expected to do in that regard.

Second: we find that the1 petitioner was not living apart from her husband for just cause and that he has made numerous attempts, during the year preceding the filing of the divorce petition, to become reconciled to her and to induce her to live with him.

For these reasons we think that the petition must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TANNER, P. J.

This is a petition for divorce upon the ground of nonsupport.

We ñnd from the evidence, first: that the petitioner has not proven by a fair preponderance of the evidence that the defendant has not provided necessaries for the support of herself and child for the statutory period to the best of his ability. On the contrary, it seems to us .that, considering his circumstances, he has done all that he could he expected to do in that regard.

Second: we find that the1 petitioner was not living apart from her husband for just cause and that he has made numerous attempts, during the year preceding the filing of the divorce petition, to become reconciled to her and to induce her to live with him.

For these reasons we think that the petition must be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 R.I. Dec. 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurvitz-v-hurvitz-risuperct-1925.