Hurtado v. State

109 So. 3d 883, 2013 WL 1136397, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4451
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 20, 2013
DocketNo. 3D13-192
StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 3d 883 (Hurtado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hurtado v. State, 109 So. 3d 883, 2013 WL 1136397, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4451 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Chaidez v. United States, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1103, 185 L.Ed.2d 149 (2013) (holding that Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively); Hernandez v. State, — So.3d -(Fla.2012) (same).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Chaidez v. United States
133 S. Ct. 1103 (Supreme Court, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 So. 3d 883, 2013 WL 1136397, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurtado-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.