Hurt v. Wiley

89 S.E. 494, 18 Ga. App. 420, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 386
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 12, 1916
Docket6988
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 S.E. 494 (Hurt v. Wiley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hurt v. Wiley, 89 S.E. 494, 18 Ga. App. 420, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Hodges, J.

1. Any person indorsing or transferring a note may limit his own liability upon such indorsement or transfer, but he must do so by express restrictions contained in the indorsement or transfer. Civil Code, § 4275.

2. The holder of a negotiable note is presumed to be a bona fide purchaser for value; and such a holder could maintain suit on the note against a payee signing a transfer indorsed thereon as follows: “I hereby transfer my interest in this note to” J. W. B.; the suit being against the original maker and the person so indorsing. “Where the payee of such an instrument, by a writing placed on the back of it, ‘transfers, sells, and assigns’ the bill of sale, the note, and the title to the property, to a third person, he becomes such an indorser as to be [421]*421liable to suit in the same action with the maker.” Walker v. Carpenter, 5 Ga. App. 427 (63 S. E. 576). Judgment affirmed.

Decided July 12, 1916. Complaint; from municipal court of Atlanta. September 37, 1915. G. B. Rosser Jr., Ben. J. Conyers, for plaintiff in error. John Y. Smith, M. Herzberg, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCullough v. Stepp
85 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Jones v. Commercial Credit Co.
184 S.E. 652 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 494, 18 Ga. App. 420, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurt-v-wiley-gactapp-1916.