Hurt v. Wiley
This text of 89 S.E. 494 (Hurt v. Wiley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Any person indorsing or transferring a note may limit his own liability upon such indorsement or transfer, but he must do so by express restrictions contained in the indorsement or transfer. Civil Code, § 4275.
2. The holder of a negotiable note is presumed to be a bona fide purchaser for value; and such a holder could maintain suit on the note against a payee signing a transfer indorsed thereon as follows: “I hereby transfer my interest in this note to” J. W. B.; the suit being against the original maker and the person so indorsing. “Where the payee of such an instrument, by a writing placed on the back of it, ‘transfers, sells, and assigns’ the bill of sale, the note, and the title to the property, to a third person, he becomes such an indorser as to be [421]*421liable to suit in the same action with the maker.” Walker v. Carpenter, 5 Ga. App. 427 (63 S. E. 576). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.E. 494, 18 Ga. App. 420, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurt-v-wiley-gactapp-1916.