Hurt v. Wiley

89 S.E. 494, 18 Ga. App. 420, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 386
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 12, 1916·No. 6988·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hodges, J.

1. Any person indorsing or transferring a note may limit his own liability upon such indorsement or transfer, but he must do so by express restrictions contained in the indorsement or transfer. Civil Code, § 4275.

2. The holder of a negotiable note is presumed to be a bona fide purchaser for value; and such a holder could maintain suit on the note against a payee signing a transfer indorsed thereon as follows: “I hereby transfer my interest in this note to” J. W. B.; the suit being against the original maker and the person so indorsing. “Where the payee of such an instrument, by a writing placed on the back of it, ‘transfers, sells, and assigns’ the bill of sale, the note, and the title to the property, to a third person, he becomes such an indorser as to be [421] liable to suit in the same action with the maker.” Walker v. Carpenter, 5 Ga. App. 427 (63 S. E. 576). Judgment affirmed.

Decided July 12, 1916. Complaint; from municipal court of Atlanta. September 37, 1915. G. B. Rosser Jr., Ben. J. Conyers, for plaintiff in error. John Y. Smith, M. Herzberg, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hurt v. Wiley, 89 S.E. 494, 18 Ga. App. 420, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

89 S.E. 494 (Hurt v. Wiley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCullough v. Stepp
85 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Jones v. Commercial Credit Co.
184 S.E. 652 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)