Hurt v. U.S. Constitution

Fourth Circuit

Hurt v. U.S. Constitution

641 F. App'x 259

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 18, 2016

DocketNo. 15-2375

StatusPublished

This text of 641 F. App'x 259 (Hurt v. U.S. Constitution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hurt v. U.S. Constitution, 641 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order dismissing this civil action for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and conclude that there was no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. U.S. Constitution, No. 5:15-cv-00488-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 29, 2015). The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order dismissing this civil action for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and conclude that there was no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. U.S. Constitution, No. 5:15-cv-00488-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 29, 2015). The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

641 F. App'x 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurt-v-us-constitution-ca4-2016.