Hurt v. United States Parole Comm.

475 F. App'x 911
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 16, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6554
StatusPublished

This text of 475 F. App'x 911 (Hurt v. United States Parole Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hurt v. United States Parole Comm., 475 F. App'x 911 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing him from this action seeking the removal of a detainer lodged against another plaintiff, William Turner. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Hurt seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 F. App'x 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurt-v-united-states-parole-comm-ca4-2012.