Hurt v. United States Marshal Service
This text of Hurt v. United States Marshal Service (Hurt v. United States Marshal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7271
TYRONE HURT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; UNKNOWN AGENT; U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE D.C.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00624-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: February 20, 2009 Decided: March 10, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his Bivens complaint. * We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. United States
Marshal Serv., No. 1:08-cv-00624-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. June 24,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hurt v. United States Marshal Service, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurt-v-united-states-marshal-service-ca4-2009.