Hurt v. United States Marshal Service

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 10, 2009
Docket08-7271
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hurt v. United States Marshal Service (Hurt v. United States Marshal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hurt v. United States Marshal Service, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7271

TYRONE HURT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; UNKNOWN AGENT; U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE D.C.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00624-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: February 20, 2009 Decided: March 10, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his Bivens complaint. * We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. United States

Marshal Serv., No. 1:08-cv-00624-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. June 24,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hurt v. United States Marshal Service, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurt-v-united-states-marshal-service-ca4-2009.