Hurt v. Unit 32
Opinion
FILED NOV 19 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts
) TYRONE HURT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1784 ) UNIT 32, 422 CHESAPEAKE STREET, S.E., ) ) Defendant. ) ---------------)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The plaintiff filed his complaint and request to proceed in forma pauperis in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California. This action has been transferred to 1lv this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). le'plaintiffhas been barred from proceeding in
forma pauperis both in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
and in this district court. See Hurt v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 544 F.3d 308, 311 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (per
curiam) (revoking "Hurt's IFP privilege, dismiss[ing] all his appeals pending before this Court
and direct[ing] the Clerk of the Court to refuse to accept any more of Hurt's civil appeals that are
not accompanied by the appropriate filing fees"); Hurt v. The Declaration of Independence, No.
07-0647 (D.D.C. Jan. 9, 2009) (Order barring Hurt from proceeding in forma pauperis in this
Court). Accordingly, the plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied, and his
complaint will be dismissed. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
DATE: ~ v, /~~ ~fV Un ed States D1stnct Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hurt v. Unit 32 (Hurt v. Unit 32) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.