Hurt v. Terrell

641 F. App'x 257
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 18, 2016
DocketNos. 15-2329, 15-2357, 15-2358, 15-2359, 15-2384, 15-2386, 15-2388
StatusPublished

This text of 641 F. App'x 257 (Hurt v. Terrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hurt v. Terrell, 641 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

[258]*258Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the records and conclude that these appeals are frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Terrell, No. 5:15-cv00414-BO; Hurt v. United States, Nos. 5:15-cv-00328-BO, 5:15-cv-00334-BO, 5:15-cv-00424-BO, 5:15-cv-00324-BO, 5:15-cv-00484-BO; Hurt v. International Criminal Court, No. 5:15-cv-00518-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 19, 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
641 F. App'x 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hurt-v-terrell-ca4-2016.