Hurt v. State

893 So. 2d 601, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 105, 2005 WL 235708
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 13, 2005·No. No. 1D04-4382·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the appellant filed an unauthorized motion for rehearing in the trial court prior to filing the notice of appeal, rendition of the underlying order was not delayed. See Griffis v. State, 593 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Therefore, the notice of appeal, filed August 23, 2004, and seeking review of the trial court’s order of May 11, 2004, was untimely filed. We treat the appellant’s petition for a belated appeal as a response to the previously issued order to show cause and find it to be without merit. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK and HAWKES, JJ.,-.concur..,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hurt v. State, 893 So. 2d 601, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 105, 2005 WL 235708 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

893 So. 2d 601 (Hurt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffis v. State
593 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)